Oy Ve. A Kosher Search Engine.

June 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Too funny not to share…

koogleKoogle is a ‘kosher’ search engine that enable devout ultra-Orthodox Jews to search the web without stumbling into sexually explicit or inappropriate material. The site caters to rabbis who want to search the web but fear being visually assaulted my immodesty or pornography. Cleverly named, Koogle is a play on kugel (yum)+ Google.

The best part: it doesn’t run on the Sabbath.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

FamilyFridge.co.uk

June 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I’m overwhelmingly proud of my good pal Lex, who recently launched FamilyFridge, an online tool to help families stay on top of hectic schedules and keep track of significant life events.

brochureLogoFamilyFridge cleverly combines social-networking features with organizational tools like shared calendars, birthday lists, reminders and photo sharing all secure behind the ‘family firewall.’ Private information can be stored securely in the Freezer section and although you probably won’t log in everyday, FamilyFridge saves the day when you forget your grandparents’ wedding anniversary or need your cousin’s mailing address. It’s also free to use.

You can check out Lex’s video pitch on BBC’s Dragon’s Den.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Social Web
Tagged: , , ,

Hello, I’m a Mac

May 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I’m a convert. I’ve used or owned a PC my entire life, but at age 26 I am now the proud owner of a little 13″ black MacBook with 2.4 GHz and 2.2 GB RAM.

Not only do I own this beauty but I occasionally wear skinny jeans and drink coffee from Ritual and ride a single-speed bicycle in San Francisco. Bear witness: I will never cross the  hipster threshold and ride my bike to Ritual to work on my MacBook. I digress…

As a new Mac owner I take even more pleasure in the Get a Mac ads that recently came out. They say marketing is the new customer service – and Apple has really tapped into this mantra with their Genius Bar. Here’s my fave new ad:

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Stop Being Confused

May 7, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Speaking with a co-worker the other day prompted some reflection around the cloud computing market. There’s been a significant shift in the coverage of cloud related news. The story lines used to lead with confusion – what is this thing? How do we define it? Or as I’ve heard MR Rangawami say, ‘Is it SaaS with lipstick?’

 

SaaS With Lipstick

SaaS With Lipstick

 

No one can agree. And no one interview or conference will ever resolve this burning question. It might not be tidy, but it’s fact. 

Instead of attempting to define cloud computing we should instead focus on the value proposition, which almost everyone can agree on. The common demoninator in all cloud solutions / platforms / applications is two fold.

1. You use someone else’s gear.

2. You use someone else’s people.

Voila! Just to get some perspective on how much has changed, I want to post this hilarious Larry Ellison quote from September 2008. 

“The interesting thing about cloud computing is that we’ve redefined cloud computing to include everything that we already do. I can’t think of anything that isn’t cloud computing with all of these announcements. The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women’s fashion. Maybe I’m an idiot, but I have no idea what anyone is talking about. What is it? It’s complete gibberish. It’s insane. When is this idiocy going to stop?

Tee hee. 

 

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Conferences · cloud computing
Tagged: , , , ,

The Big O is on Twitter

April 17, 2009 · 1 Comment

Breaking news today… Oprah Winfrey has opened a Twitter profile. Her first words?

HI TWITTERS!

Like all things Oprah Winfrey touches, this will no doubt mark a huge, mad influx of new Twitter accounts, as Oprah fanatics create their own profile so they can follow her tweets and discover a new recipe sharing platform. OMG!

oprah

→ 1 CommentCategories: Social Web
Tagged: , , ,

Business Models are a Pain in the Ass

April 13, 2009 · 1 Comment

It appears the era of free flowing information on the Web is tapering off. The Associated Press announced last Monday that they will begin to track how their content is used in an effort to start receiving revenue share where their content is being repurposed and monies are collected. If the A.P. and the media outlet can’t come to some agreement, the Associated Press will threaten legal action.

I’m genuinely surprised it’s taken this long. As the Web has evolved, the legal ramifications that trail behind are establishing new precedents and case law. It’s been a bit of a free for all, but it looks like the good times are coming to an end.

joinordie2

To solve this pesky content ownership problem, the A.P. said it would build its own searchable landing page where links from member media outfits would aggregate tidily under the A.P. name.

There are thousands of news related websites that repurpose  content and serve up (usually Google) ads alongside that day’s featured stories. Suddenly that smug feeling of  having your business model dialed in and being profitable doesn’t seem so safe and secure. Although the A.P.’s announcement didn’t name names, the biggest culprit is a little website called Google News; Google relies heavily on the A.P.’s member newspapers for content.

It appears newspapers are getting a touch desperate. As David Carr succinctly put it:

The current recession combined with a structural shift in ad spending and consumer habits have left the newspaper industry in a box canyon. Many believe they have no choice but to shoot their way out, even if it means taking on Google and the hundreds of millions of eyeballs it represents.

Eric Schmidt, Google CEO, made it clear that he doesn’t want to pay to distribute content to users, but Google could make it easier for newspapers to charge end users for their content. In a recent press conference after the Newspaper Association of America meeting in San Diego last week, Schmidt diplomatically stated:

Anything that makes it easier for your content to get to your users is a win.

As a new story emerges each week about a newspaper losing money or on the verge of closing down, the need to evolve with the times has reached a pivotal ‘change or die’ point.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Media 2.0
Tagged: , , , ,

Play Nice

March 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

It never ceases to amaze me how difficult it is to convince different business units and divisions within a corporation to work together. Each group works in a comfortable silo and is primarily tasked with achieving goals native to their group. Even though it’s painfully obvious to all those outside the firewall that it’s good to share the wealth, egos and personalities prevent teamwork and collaboration.

What’s even more baffling is that these people sell collaboration software!

This isn’t a terribly thought provoking post. More of an anger management tool. Thanks.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Corporate Culture

The Comedy & Tragedy of Facebook

March 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I have mixed feelings about the crazy stories that result from Facebook (mis)communications. I simultaneously love hearing them and also cringe at the naievete.

Everybody knows somebody who’s career, relationship or friendships have been broken or negatively impacted by their use of Facebook. These types of stories are newsworthy because there is a tabloid feel to these OMG-did-you-hear tales of woe. This one popped up a couple of weeks ago but I just heard about it.

A 16 year old named Kimberley Swann from Clacton on Sea in England was fired from her job at Ivell Marketing and Logistics Limited after writing on her Facebook profile:

all i do is shred holepunch n scan paper!!! omg!‘” … “im so totally bord!!!

The comment is hilarious in and of itself, but Kimberley is not laughing. Is it fair for her employer to leverage this information and fire her? Oliver Marks makes a good point:

Historically a few pints, cigarettes and grumbles after work in the pub has been a popular way to unwind. Management could set foot in the same bar and eavesdrop, but they are more likely to be in a different one grumbling about their staff as well….

I’ve blogged about the ways Facebook has impacted society before, but I’m now feeling more compassionate. Working in this industry we can view disruptive technologies at an arm’s length and observe the ripple effects. To the layperson who creates a Facebook account and uses it as a tool of expression without considering the implications on their job or relationships, it seems unfair to suffer consequences from being honest. After all, there’s no user manual or instruction provided.

So is honest the best policy? I’d say yes — unless you plan on updating your Facebook profile with something that could come back to bite you.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Social Web
Tagged: , , ,

Drowning in the Deep Web

February 25, 2009 · 2 Comments

The concept of the semantic web is not terribly new. As humans we provide direction to the search engine to retrieve what we’re seeking. The semantic web would go beyond the direction we give it to form its own conclusions and deduce what we want. According to Wikipedia:

semantic web is a vision of information that is understandable by computers, so that they can perform more of the tedious work involved in finding, sharing, and combining information on the web.

drowning_small1

It’s difficult for search engines to process data cognitively – they’re only machines after all. The deductive reasoning research inherent in the semantic web are a long way out. Or so I thought until I read this article.

The challenges that the major search engines face in penetrating this so-called Deep Web go a long way toward explaining why they still can’t provide satisfying answers to questions like “What’s the best fare from New York to London next Thursday?” The answers are readily available — if only the search engines knew how to find them.

Now a new breed of technologies is taking shape that will extend the reach of search engines into the Web’s hidden corners. When that happens, it will do more than just improve the quality of search results — it may ultimately reshape the way many companies do business online.

Search engines rely on programs known as crawlers (or spiders) that gather information by following the trails of hyperlinks that tie the Web together. While that approach works well for the pages that make up the surface Web, these programs have a harder time penetrating databases that are set up to respond to typed queries.

This type of Deep Web searching is not only good for consumers wanting to book a flight, but it would allow businesses to cross-reference their data with research and news to come back with results that reflect political and social landscapes.

Who is pushing the boundary on this? I bet you can guess.

Google’s Deep Web search strategy involves sending out a program to analyze the contents of every database it encounters. For example, if the search engine finds a page with a form related to fine art, it starts guessing likely search terms — “Rembrandt,” “Picasso,” “Vermeer” and so on — until one of those terms returns a match. The search engine then analyzes the results and develops a predictive model of what the database contains.

In a similar vein, Prof. Juliana Freire at the University of Utah is working on an ambitious project called DeepPeep (www.deeppeep.org) that eventually aims to crawl and index every database on the public Web. Extracting the contents of so many far-flung data sets requires a sophisticated kind of computational guessing game.

I’m excited to start booking my travel.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Social Web

Shedding Some Light on PaaS

February 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

When seeking to get one’s application off the ground there are many platform-as-a-service vendors that provide attractive, custom-built business process automation. By leveraging built-in infrastructure services, companies don’t have to spend their dollars on software deployment and delivery. Many vendors have emerged as market leaders, including Force.com, Bungee Labs and Coghead.

Depending on your application, some platforms have ‘flavor’ and are better than others for nestling with certain apps. Other platforms are ‘flavorless’ — meaning they are not predisposed to any specific types of applications. Which one is better in the long haul will become apparent over time.

164323

But relying on someone else’s platform can create an entirely new set of problems. For a budding application provider with an exceptionally healthy growth curve, the platform could have difficulty scaling to handle the multiplying number of users. Saving money on upfront deployment is one thing, but inhibiting future growth could mean missing out on future opportunity and business, and is ultimately more harmful to a new company. To illustrate this, what if Facebook was an application built on Salesforce.com? The student would surpass the teacher.

Vendor lock-in is another serious issue. PaaS offerings provide either proprietary service interfaces or proprietary development languages which tie an application to the platform. This is is sure to cause future headaches for developers.

Developers beware…

→ Leave a CommentCategories: cloud computing